<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Robot Librarian</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robotlibrarian.billdueber.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robotlibrarian.billdueber.com</link>
	<description>Disclaimer: I'm not actually a robot.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:57:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New interest in MARC-HASH / JSON by Dilettante&#039;s Ball &#187; Blog Archive &#187; For your consideration: yet another MARC-in-JSON proposal pt. 1</title>
		<link>http://robotlibrarian.billdueber.com/new-interest-in-marc-hash-json/comment-page-1/#comment-681</link>
		<dc:creator>Dilettante&#039;s Ball &#187; Blog Archive &#187; For your consideration: yet another MARC-in-JSON proposal pt. 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robotlibrarian.billdueber.com/?p=204#comment-681</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] far we have two well-publicized suggestions: one by Bill Dueber, at the University of Michigan; and one by Andrew Houghton, who works at OCLC Research. They are quite different and each have [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] far we have two well-publicized suggestions: one by Bill Dueber, at the University of Michigan; and one by Andrew Houghton, who works at <acronym title="Online Computer Library Center">OCLC</acronym> Research. They are quite different and each have [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solr: Forcing items with all query terms to the top of a Solr search by Jonathan Rochkind</title>
		<link>http://robotlibrarian.billdueber.com/solr-forcing-items-with-all-query-terms-to-the-top-of-a-solr-search/comment-page-1/#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Rochkind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robotlibrarian.billdueber.com/solr-forcing-items-with-all-query-terms-to-the-top-of-a-solr-search/#comment-679</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Bah, that got rid of my brackets. let&#039;s try again without brackets, but this is defaults in solrconfig.xml&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;str name=&quot;bf&quot; map(query($all_terms),0,0,0,100000.0)  /str&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;str name=&quot;all_terms&quot; {!dismax qf=text pf=&#039;&#039; bf=&#039;&#039; bq=&#039;&#039; mm=&#039;100%&#039; v=$q}  /str&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bah, that got rid of my brackets. let&#8217;s try again without brackets, but this is defaults in solrconfig.xml</p>

<p>str name=&#8221;bf&#8221; map(query($all_terms),0,0,0,100000.0)  /str</p>

<p>str name=&#8221;all_terms&#8221; {!dismax qf=text pf=&#8221; bf=&#8221; bq=&#8221; mm=&#8217;100%&#8217; v=$q}  /str</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solr: Forcing items with all query terms to the top of a Solr search by Jonathan Rochkind</title>
		<link>http://robotlibrarian.billdueber.com/solr-forcing-items-with-all-query-terms-to-the-top-of-a-solr-search/comment-page-1/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Rochkind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robotlibrarian.billdueber.com/solr-forcing-items-with-all-query-terms-to-the-top-of-a-solr-search/#comment-678</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s my refinement, which avoids the need for the client to send the qq, everything is just computed based on existing &#039;q&#039;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;map(query($all_terms),0,0,0,100000.0)
{!dismax qf=text pf=&#039;&#039; bf=&#039;&#039; bq=&#039;&#039; mm=&#039;100%&#039; v=$q}&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Seems to work to do the same thing yours does. Of course, now this is indeed by default applied to every single query, including queries it doesn&#039;t make any sense for (or may even error for?) like queries that weren&#039;t originally dismax (like &#039;advanced&#039; search).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not quite sure the best way to deal with this in blacklight, just playing around with different approaches to this functionality, seeing which will require the least code. :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my refinement, which avoids the need for the client to send the qq, everything is just computed based on existing &#8216;q&#8217;.</p>

<p>map(query($all_terms),0,0,0,100000.0)
{!dismax qf=text pf=&#8221; bf=&#8221; bq=&#8221; mm=&#8217;100%&#8217; v=$q}</p>

<p>Seems to work to do the same thing yours does. Of course, now this is indeed by default applied to every single query, including queries it doesn&#8217;t make any sense for (or may even error for?) like queries that weren&#8217;t originally dismax (like &#8216;advanced&#8217; search).</p>

<p>Not quite sure the best way to deal with this in blacklight, just playing around with different approaches to this functionality, seeing which will require the least code. <img src='http://robotlibrarian.billdueber.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solr: Forcing items with all query terms to the top of a Solr search by Naomi Dushay</title>
		<link>http://robotlibrarian.billdueber.com/solr-forcing-items-with-all-query-terms-to-the-top-of-a-solr-search/comment-page-1/#comment-677</link>
		<dc:creator>Naomi Dushay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 02:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robotlibrarian.billdueber.com/solr-forcing-items-with-all-query-terms-to-the-top-of-a-solr-search/#comment-677</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;More questions:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;couldn&#039;t you have set mm higher, or did you want to make sure you still got the more comprehensive result set?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m also wondering if there are other ways to reduce the importance of the size-of-the-document.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Have you also tweaked for unstemmed matches &gt;&gt; stemmed matches  (cooking vs. cooked)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;and for proximity using the pf and ps boosts?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More questions:</p>

<p>couldn&#8217;t you have set mm higher, or did you want to make sure you still got the more comprehensive result set?</p>

<p>I&#8217;m also wondering if there are other ways to reduce the importance of the size-of-the-document.</p>

<p>Have you also tweaked for unstemmed matches &gt;&gt; stemmed matches  (cooking vs. cooked)</p>

<p>and for proximity using the pf and ps boosts?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solr: Forcing items with all query terms to the top of a Solr search by Naomi Dushay</title>
		<link>http://robotlibrarian.billdueber.com/solr-forcing-items-with-all-query-terms-to-the-top-of-a-solr-search/comment-page-1/#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator>Naomi Dushay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 02:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robotlibrarian.billdueber.com/solr-forcing-items-with-all-query-terms-to-the-top-of-a-solr-search/#comment-676</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So what sort of relevancy testing did you use to confirm the new way is better than the old way?  Nice repeatable, automate-able tests, right?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what sort of relevancy testing did you use to confirm the new way is better than the old way?  Nice repeatable, automate-able tests, right?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New interest in MARC-HASH / JSON by Coffee&#124;Code : Dan Scott</title>
		<link>http://robotlibrarian.billdueber.com/new-interest-in-marc-hash-json/comment-page-1/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>Coffee&#124;Code : Dan Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 17:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robotlibrarian.billdueber.com/?p=204#comment-667</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;File_MARC 0.6.0 - now offering two tasty flavours of MARC-as-JSON output...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve just released the PHP PEAR library File_MARC 0.6.0. This release brings two JSON serialization output methods for MARC to the table: toJSONHash() returns JSON that adheres to Bill Dueber&#039;s proposal for the array-oriented MARC-HASH JSON format at...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>File_MARC 0.6.0 &#8211; now offering two tasty flavours of <acronym title="MAchine Readable Cataloging">MARC</acronym>-as-JSON output&#8230;</strong></p>

<p>I&#8217;ve just released the <acronym title="Pre-Hypertext Processing">PHP</acronym> PEAR library File_MARC 0.6.0. This release brings two JSON serialization output methods for <acronym title="MAchine Readable Cataloging">MARC</acronym> to the table: toJSONHash() returns JSON that adheres to Bill Dueber&#8217;s proposal for the array-oriented <acronym title="MAchine Readable Cataloging">MARC</acronym>-HASH JSON format at&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Data structures and Serializations by Jakob</title>
		<link>http://robotlibrarian.billdueber.com/data-structures-and-serializations/comment-page-1/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 07:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robotlibrarian.billdueber.com/?p=235#comment-665</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, FRBR is one example of a Domain Model - librarians can do this. But with FRBR they failed to define a serialization. Domain Models help you to &lt;em&gt;talk&lt;/em&gt; about things with human beings. But to exchange data you need a serialization of the model. I agree that the model must come first, but when you stop there, you end up doing no data exchange but philosophy (which is nice too).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, <acronym title="Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records">FRBR</acronym> is one example of a Domain Model &#8211; librarians can do this. But with <acronym title="Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records">FRBR</acronym> they failed to define a serialization. Domain Models help you to <em>talk</em> about things with human beings. But to exchange data you need a serialization of the model. I agree that the model must come first, but when you stop there, you end up doing no data exchange but philosophy (which is nice too).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New interest in MARC-HASH / JSON by thatcher</title>
		<link>http://robotlibrarian.billdueber.com/new-interest-in-marc-hash-json/comment-page-1/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>thatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 20:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robotlibrarian.billdueber.com/?p=204#comment-661</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2008660390/marc?fo=json&amp;at=marc&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2008660390/marc?fo=json&amp;at=marc" rel="nofollow">http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2008660390/marc?fo=json&amp;at=marc</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sending MARC(ish) data to Refworks by Ali</title>
		<link>http://robotlibrarian.billdueber.com/sending-marcish-data-to-refworks/comment-page-1/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 16:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robotlibrarian.billdueber.com/?p=71#comment-660</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Bill,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Good stuff. I will see if I can do similar for YorkU Vufind Instance.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ali&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bill,</p>

<p>Good stuff. I will see if I can do similar for YorkU Vufind Instance.</p>

<p>Cheers,</p>

<p>Ali</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why RDA is doomed to failure by Bruce</title>
		<link>http://robotlibrarian.billdueber.com/why-rda-is-doomed-to-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 23:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robotlibrarian.billdueber.com/why-rda-is-doomed-to-failure/#comment-659</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If you wonder whether this disconnect between computer science and library science (specifically cataloging) is real, stroll down your QA76 range of shelves sometime and marvel at the distribution of shelving locations for something like Oracle how-to books.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you wonder whether this disconnect between computer science and library science (specifically cataloging) is real, stroll down your QA76 range of shelves sometime and marvel at the distribution of shelving locations for something like Oracle how-to books.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.413 seconds -->
